In An Apple for the Enterprise, InfoWorld’s Tom Yager provides 10 ways to silence Apple-phobic IT professionals when they spout misperceptions about the Mac.
Sadly, shooting them in the face with a fire hose is not one of the ways.
Full of sound and furry
Tom Yager rebuts 10 Mac myths.
In An Apple for the Enterprise, InfoWorld’s Tom Yager provides 10 ways to silence Apple-phobic IT professionals when they spout misperceptions about the Mac.
Sadly, shooting them in the face with a fire hose is not one of the ways.
Tom goes into the AMD thing, too, I see. I’d like to have someone who knows something more about this talk about how likely that is in the short term. To me it just sounds like a lot more work for little benefit: as it is, the OS has to know how to best stroke two different architectures with a number of different feature sets just right to make them purr; adding another with even more permutations, not to mention AMD’s fabled hackability, seems like a hassle. I’m probably way off, but I’d still like someone to not just throw an AMD comment in there so facilely, as though it’s settled one way or the other.
My list goes to eleven.
(Implying that shooting in the face with a firehose is no. 11. Get it?)
From what I’ve read are the currently line of Intel chips not showing AMD how it’s really done? I haven’t heard anything from AMD in a long, long time.