This week’s Macworld column acknowledges that it’s possible that Apple’s doomed, it just isn’t very likely.
Stating the obvious
Could Apple theoretically be doomed? Sure. Is it likely? No.
Full of sound and furry
Could Apple theoretically be doomed? Sure. Is it likely? No.
This week’s Macworld column acknowledges that it’s possible that Apple’s doomed, it just isn’t very likely.
Why might Apple not want to sell a really cheap iPhone? Hmm. Hmm.
Today’s Macworld column looks at why Apple might not want to sell a cheap iPhone. Hmm, why could that be?
The biggest threat to Apple evah! Ehh, not so much.
Today’s Macworld column looks at the biggest threat to Apple evah! Which is not.
Theories are nice, but it’s reality that matters.
This week’s Macworld column notes that theories are nice, but it’s reality that really matters.
Apple must build a phone that will break iOS! Huh?
Today’s Macworld column looks at the notion that Apple must build a larger phone… a phone that will break iOS!
Apple admits to failure! (Disclaimer: Apple does not actually admit to failure.)
This week’s Macworld column looks at suggestions that Apple is doomed and then outright admissions that it’s failed! (Disclaimer: no actual admissions included.)
With articles like these, who needs to read the book?
Today’s Macworld column suspects that if the article it picks apart is any indicator, the author’s book is not going to be great.
Much of the pundit business is a charade.
This week’s Macworld column notices some of the ridiculous games pundits play.
Apple announces quarterly results, pundits rush to describe doom.
Yesterday’s Macworld column looks at some choice reaction to Apple’s quarterly results.
Did this guy buy a Jump To Conclusions mat?
Today’s Macworld column says you’re out of order, this whole court is out of order!