<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did everyone at PCWorld take their stupid pills today?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/</link>
	<description>Full of sound and furry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:20:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grover</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3250</link>
		<dc:creator>Grover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3250</guid>
		<description>Oh wow, it&#039;s been a long time since I&#039;ve laughed as hard as I did over the Mrs. Macalope&#039;s ignoring the dock. Whooo boy, that&#039;s good stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow, it&#8217;s been a long time since I&#8217;ve laughed as hard as I did over the Mrs. Macalope&#8217;s ignoring the dock. Whooo boy, that&#8217;s good stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; give us this day our daily kool-aid i drank the kool-aid: clutching my dixie cup of apple goodness</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3248</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; give us this day our daily kool-aid i drank the kool-aid: clutching my dixie cup of apple goodness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3248</guid>
		<description>[...] Did everyone at PCWorld take their stupid pills today? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Did everyone at PCWorld take their stupid pills today? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradI</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3246</link>
		<dc:creator>BradI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3246</guid>
		<description>Sir Macalope: everyone missed the point entirely - I however understood!  My Mrs. also manages to ignore the bouncing software update icon.   I&#039;ve never seen Weeds though.  (I laughed hysterically reading the Mrs. Macalope bit.)

I just have to click that darn thing or I&#039;ll go insane (not that I have to run it of course); my ocd requires that I notice icons that are hopping up and down.  It&#039;s like they&#039;re holding their little hands up; but clicking &quot;not now&quot; still satisfies the need to impose &quot;order&quot;...    ; - )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir Macalope: everyone missed the point entirely &#8211; I however understood!  My Mrs. also manages to ignore the bouncing software update icon.   I&#8217;ve never seen Weeds though.  (I laughed hysterically reading the Mrs. Macalope bit.)</p>
<p>I just have to click that darn thing or I&#8217;ll go insane (not that I have to run it of course); my ocd requires that I notice icons that are hopping up and down.  It&#8217;s like they&#8217;re holding their little hands up; but clicking &#8220;not now&#8221; still satisfies the need to impose &#8220;order&#8221;&#8230;    ; &#8211; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Church of Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3247</link>
		<dc:creator>The Church of Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3247</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now compare all this to the millions of unknowing Windoze users who got stuck with IE7 automatically a couple of years ago and now are getting stuck with IE8 with no warning at all …&quot;

Sadly, they&#039;re probably doing everyone a favor. If you&#039;ve ever had to design a website, you&#039;d understand.

I don&#039;t know about all this auto-update baloney. I&#039;ve had to go to Apple&#039;s website EVERY time to download it. Except ONCE when I was using the beta.

0_o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now compare all this to the millions of unknowing Windoze users who got stuck with IE7 automatically a couple of years ago and now are getting stuck with IE8 with no warning at all …&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly, they&#8217;re probably doing everyone a favor. If you&#8217;ve ever had to design a website, you&#8217;d understand.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about all this auto-update baloney. I&#8217;ve had to go to Apple&#8217;s website EVERY time to download it. Except ONCE when I was using the beta.</p>
<p>0_o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Partners in Grime</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3267</link>
		<dc:creator>Partners in Grime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3267</guid>
		<description>Apparently the number is big enough to attract attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently the number is big enough to attract attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Macalope</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>The Macalope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 02:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>Spelling fixed. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spelling fixed. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macalope on PCWorld&#8217;s &#8220;Safari numbers are hype&#8221; article &#171; Day and Age</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3265</link>
		<dc:creator>Macalope on PCWorld&#8217;s &#8220;Safari numbers are hype&#8221; article &#171; Day and Age</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3265</guid>
		<description>[...] The Macalope picks apart PCWorld’s Robert Strohmeyer and his article claiming the afore linked Safari download numbers are &#8220;pure hype&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Macalope picks apart PCWorld’s Robert Strohmeyer and his article claiming the afore linked Safari download numbers are &#8220;pure hype&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDA</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3264</link>
		<dc:creator>DDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3264</guid>
		<description>First off, I assume the Macalope meant, &quot;That&#039;s *an* interesting theory...&quot;

IE (at least as far as Windows XP) is in integral part of the OS and so updates are delivered as part of the normal Tuesday (in the US) Microsoft patch update; the default is to download and install updates but I&#039;ve turned that off on my work machine. IE8 *is* currently being pushed by Microsoft but I don&#039;t know if they&#039;ve announced &quot;download&quot; numbers.

Safari 4.0 is only being offered by one of my three Macs and yes, it is flagged as needing a reboot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I assume the Macalope meant, &#8220;That&#8217;s *an* interesting theory&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>IE (at least as far as Windows XP) is in integral part of the OS and so updates are delivered as part of the normal Tuesday (in the US) Microsoft patch update; the default is to download and install updates but I&#8217;ve turned that off on my work machine. IE8 *is* currently being pushed by Microsoft but I don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;ve announced &#8220;download&#8221; numbers.</p>
<p>Safari 4.0 is only being offered by one of my three Macs and yes, it is flagged as needing a reboot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Macalope</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3263</link>
		<dc:creator>The Macalope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3263</guid>
		<description>Ah, that clears up some confusion the Macalope had. He knew that some updates weren&#039;t auto-downloading but didn&#039;t make the distinction.

Here&#039;s something else he doesn&#039;t get about Strohmeyer&#039;s anecdotes: who downloads an update that forces a reboot when they don&#039;t use the software? Safari 4.0 did force a reboot, didn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, that clears up some confusion the Macalope had. He knew that some updates weren&#8217;t auto-downloading but didn&#8217;t make the distinction.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s something else he doesn&#8217;t get about Strohmeyer&#8217;s anecdotes: who downloads an update that forces a reboot when they don&#8217;t use the software? Safari 4.0 did force a reboot, didn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3262</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2009/06/12/did-everyone-at-pcworld-take-their-stupid-pills-today/#comment-3262</guid>
		<description>As stated above the default setting is &quot;Download IMPORTANT updates automatically&quot;.  I have the default checked checked but never has there been a download without me OKing it, Safari 4 wasn&#039;t auto for sure.  I wonder what an &quot;important update&quot; is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated above the default setting is &#8220;Download IMPORTANT updates automatically&#8221;.  I have the default checked checked but never has there been a download without me OKing it, Safari 4 wasn&#8217;t auto for sure.  I wonder what an &#8220;important update&#8221; is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

