<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac sales down!  Vista to blame?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/</link>
	<description>Apple news and analysis from everyone's favorite mythical Mac user</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cutemartin</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-18007</link>
		<dc:creator>cutemartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-18007</guid>
		<description>In other news this week:

European Ski Resorts in meltdown

Bosses at beleaguered ski resorts across Europe are holding crisis talks this week after shocking preliminary surveys show bookings for the next 6 months have plummeted to less than 10% of the figures for the previous 6 months.

"We don't know what went wrong," said Mr. Jobsworth, of struggling tourism operator Alp-ple. "All our customers are abandoning us in favour of going to see the Meditterranean Vista. Hopefully they'll come back next winter when we launch our new Snow Leopard package."

Analyst Paul Thurroughlywrongasalways thinks he can explain what's happened: "It's nothiing to do with warming" he said from the deck of his yacht, the MS Whore, in Monte Carlo. "Now that the Med has built its own mountains and stolen much of the world's snow, the game's up for the Alps."

"People catch skin cancer every day now, in the Alps" added Meditterranean chief Bill Everyoneevenfortheairtheybreathe. "That never happens on a beach holiday. We offer the Worst of alll Worlds. The  Woaw starts noaw."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other news this week:</p>
<p>European Ski Resorts in meltdown</p>
<p>Bosses at beleaguered ski resorts across Europe are holding crisis talks this week after shocking preliminary surveys show bookings for the next 6 months have plummeted to less than 10% of the figures for the previous 6 months.</p>
<p>&#8220;We don&#8217;t know what went wrong,&#8221; said Mr. Jobsworth, of struggling tourism operator Alp-ple. &#8220;All our customers are abandoning us in favour of going to see the Meditterranean Vista. Hopefully they&#8217;ll come back next winter when we launch our new Snow Leopard package.&#8221;</p>
<p>Analyst Paul Thurroughlywrongasalways thinks he can explain what&#8217;s happened: &#8220;It&#8217;s nothiing to do with warming&#8221; he said from the deck of his yacht, the MS Whore, in Monte Carlo. &#8220;Now that the Med has built its own mountains and stolen much of the world&#8217;s snow, the game&#8217;s up for the Alps.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;People catch skin cancer every day now, in the Alps&#8221; added Meditterranean chief Bill Everyoneevenfortheairtheybreathe. &#8220;That never happens on a beach holiday. We offer the Worst of alll Worlds. The  Woaw starts noaw.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven R W</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17767</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven R W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17767</guid>
		<description>“declines are seasonable”: And what's more.. if properly seasoned, they are delicious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“declines are seasonable”: And what&#8217;s more.. if properly seasoned, they are delicious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17680</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17680</guid>
		<description>To Bill Coleman:

You're right on the money. He clearly expected Vista sales to have an impact on Mac sales but the facts didn't support him. So he came out with an honest report in a back asswards kind of way.

But did you read the comments left on his site? The Microsoft fans were absolutely insensed with him for being pro-Apple. Stranger and stranger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Bill Coleman:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right on the money. He clearly expected Vista sales to have an impact on Mac sales but the facts didn&#8217;t support him. So he came out with an honest report in a back asswards kind of way.</p>
<p>But did you read the comments left on his site? The Microsoft fans were absolutely insensed with him for being pro-Apple. Stranger and stranger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piot</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17677</link>
		<dc:creator>Piot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17677</guid>
		<description>Sorry to repeat myself (I replied to the original article), but you don't even have to use the seasonal vs sequential argument.

Mac sales declined 5.5% (sequentially)
All PC sales declined 8.5% (sequentially)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to repeat myself (I replied to the original article), but you don&#8217;t even have to use the seasonal vs sequential argument.</p>
<p>Mac sales declined 5.5% (sequentially)<br />
All PC sales declined 8.5% (sequentially)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17622</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17622</guid>
		<description>The terribly revealing part is a comment written by Joe (whom I assume is Joe Wilcox -- the reporter for his story):

"When I saw Apple's numbers, I very much expected to write about Vista's negative impact on Mac sales. The top section was written with that expectation.

However, the consulted analysts had a different interpretation of the numbers, which I was obliged to write. Reporting leads the story."

What he's saying is that he had already written half of the artlcle beforehand. He doesn't say it, but I would gues he had the "top section" written before Apple even posted their numbers. He then expected to call up a few analysts and get some quotes to round out his reporting. Very nice.

So, when the numbers didn't fit his story, that didn't deter him. And when the analysts couldn't provide him with a money quote (was Rob Enderle not available?), he just put in what they said without reconsidering the topic of the article.

In short, he may have saved some time doing it this way -- but it's just bad reporting. If the facts don't support your thesis, you must reconsider your thesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The terribly revealing part is a comment written by Joe (whom I assume is Joe Wilcox &#8212; the reporter for his story):</p>
<p>&#8220;When I saw Apple&#8217;s numbers, I very much expected to write about Vista&#8217;s negative impact on Mac sales. The top section was written with that expectation.</p>
<p>However, the consulted analysts had a different interpretation of the numbers, which I was obliged to write. Reporting leads the story.&#8221;</p>
<p>What he&#8217;s saying is that he had already written half of the artlcle beforehand. He doesn&#8217;t say it, but I would gues he had the &#8220;top section&#8221; written before Apple even posted their numbers. He then expected to call up a few analysts and get some quotes to round out his reporting. Very nice.</p>
<p>So, when the numbers didn&#8217;t fit his story, that didn&#8217;t deter him. And when the analysts couldn&#8217;t provide him with a money quote (was Rob Enderle not available?), he just put in what they said without reconsidering the topic of the article.</p>
<p>In short, he may have saved some time doing it this way &#8212; but it&#8217;s just bad reporting. If the facts don&#8217;t support your thesis, you must reconsider your thesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dai Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17509</link>
		<dc:creator>Dai Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17509</guid>
		<description>To be fair to the guy, he does say in his comments that he started out expecting to write about vista's impact on Mac sales, but effectively changed his mind after talking to the analysts. Now, we can question why he needed analysts to point out the truth of the situation, but I think he did a fair job in the end. And now the poor sod's getting it from both ends!

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair to the guy, he does say in his comments that he started out expecting to write about vista&#8217;s impact on Mac sales, but effectively changed his mind after talking to the analysts. Now, we can question why he needed analysts to point out the truth of the situation, but I think he did a fair job in the end. And now the poor sod&#8217;s getting it from both ends!</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian Cugley</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17426</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian Cugley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17426</guid>
		<description>After all that fuss about how Apple was not launching anything specifically to compete with Vista’s launch earlier this year, it seems from their Q2 figures that not doing anything much worked out pretty well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After all that fuss about how Apple was not launching anything specifically to compete with Vista’s launch earlier this year, it seems from their Q2 figures that not doing anything much worked out pretty well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve W</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17359</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17359</guid>
		<description>@Don:

My mom had a saying for every occasion. One was, "Why be difficult? With a little more effort, you can be impossible!"

Here's hoping Apple makes it impossible to dial and drive. It might not be good for sales, but it would be great for your fellow road runners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Don:</p>
<p>My mom had a saying for every occasion. One was, &#8220;Why be difficult? With a little more effort, you can be impossible!&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping Apple makes it impossible to dial and drive. It might not be good for sales, but it would be great for your fellow road runners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neven</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17355</link>
		<dc:creator>Neven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17355</guid>
		<description>I love headlines that ask a question. Only a very stupid or a very dishonest writer would ever do it if the answer was in fact a clear "no" - otherwise, why not just say "Vista Sales Don't Sap Mac Sales"?

Hitler Alive In Israel?
Vista Actually Norton Commander Repackaged?
Mac Computers Made Of Dead Puppies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love headlines that ask a question. Only a very stupid or a very dishonest writer would ever do it if the answer was in fact a clear &#8220;no&#8221; - otherwise, why not just say &#8220;Vista Sales Don&#8217;t Sap Mac Sales&#8221;?</p>
<p>Hitler Alive In Israel?<br />
Vista Actually Norton Commander Repackaged?<br />
Mac Computers Made Of Dead Puppies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17343</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/04/26/mac-sales-down-vista-to-blame/#comment-17343</guid>
		<description>I went to read the original article. I was reluctant to do so since I thought the blogger might be fishing for hits. The article was, as the Macalop described, bizarre. The premise that the release of Vista might have somehow sapped Mac sales was contradicted by the interviews and factual evidence.

Then I read the comments on the article. And then I REALLY entered the bizarro world. Despite the fact that the author was trying to pretend that Apple didn't have the greatest 2nd quarter in it's history, the commentators were simply FURIOS that the article's author was so pro-Apple and anti- Microsoft! I'm looking at this guy and thinking he is a Microsoft tool and they are looking at him and calling him an Apple fanboy.

Honesty, I can't express how strange the comments are. You just have to read them yourself. Don't worry about giving the author unwarrented hits. When you read his article you'll see that he clearly is not intending to bait Apple supporters.

My head is spinning...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to read the original article. I was reluctant to do so since I thought the blogger might be fishing for hits. The article was, as the Macalop described, bizarre. The premise that the release of Vista might have somehow sapped Mac sales was contradicted by the interviews and factual evidence.</p>
<p>Then I read the comments on the article. And then I REALLY entered the bizarro world. Despite the fact that the author was trying to pretend that Apple didn&#8217;t have the greatest 2nd quarter in it&#8217;s history, the commentators were simply FURIOS that the article&#8217;s author was so pro-Apple and anti- Microsoft! I&#8217;m looking at this guy and thinking he is a Microsoft tool and they are looking at him and calling him an Apple fanboy.</p>
<p>Honesty, I can&#8217;t express how strange the comments are. You just have to read them yourself. Don&#8217;t worry about giving the author unwarrented hits. When you read his article you&#8217;ll see that he clearly is not intending to bait Apple supporters.</p>
<p>My head is spinning&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
