<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And that is why you fail.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/</link>
	<description>Apple news and analysis from everyone's favorite mythical Mac user</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Harbin</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11357</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Harbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11357</guid>
		<description>John,

I do in fact understand that there's a difference between me and mass market. However, I am also an average, 18-30 year old male consumer with disposible income. In my view, the iTunes store model is broken, because it delivers poor quality video. Apple's going to have a hard time pushing the aTV as a viable living room alternative when an Xbox 360 is only $100 more, and offers HD content (as well as many other things).

I am neither an Apple nor a Microsoft fanboy, although I own two Macs and a 360. I'm simply speaking as someone who would love to use a service for digital media delivery, and I can't find a reason to use Apple's. Macalope's assertion that Microsoft's rental system is a downside versus Apple's buying misses a big part of the equation, which is HD, which is why Microsoft is currently winning the 'living room' space, and why I do not think that aTV will change it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>I do in fact understand that there&#8217;s a difference between me and mass market. However, I am also an average, 18-30 year old male consumer with disposible income. In my view, the iTunes store model is broken, because it delivers poor quality video. Apple&#8217;s going to have a hard time pushing the aTV as a viable living room alternative when an Xbox 360 is only $100 more, and offers HD content (as well as many other things).</p>
<p>I am neither an Apple nor a Microsoft fanboy, although I own two Macs and a 360. I&#8217;m simply speaking as someone who would love to use a service for digital media delivery, and I can&#8217;t find a reason to use Apple&#8217;s. Macalope&#8217;s assertion that Microsoft&#8217;s rental system is a downside versus Apple&#8217;s buying misses a big part of the equation, which is HD, which is why Microsoft is currently winning the &#8216;living room&#8217; space, and why I do not think that aTV will change it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blattapus</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11284</link>
		<dc:creator>blattapus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11284</guid>
		<description>What people kinda forget is that the brick and mortar rental model is you get a movie and if you don't watch it X number of days, you have to return it or get charged extra anyway.  Someone has to &lt;b&gt;Re&lt;/b&gt;invent movie rentals for the digital age, not that the analog age rental scheme was that good to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What people kinda forget is that the brick and mortar rental model is you get a movie and if you don&#8217;t watch it X number of days, you have to return it or get charged extra anyway.  Someone has to <b>Re</b>invent movie rentals for the digital age, not that the analog age rental scheme was that good to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Blister</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11272</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Blister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11272</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; Then I take it you don’t have young kids&lt;/I&gt;

I do, in fact, have small children who behave exactly as you describe.  These movies fall into the "purchase" category, along with some classics that my wife or I will watch more than once.  I will gladly buy these through the ITMS.

And, I agree completely re wear &#38; tear.  In fact, my beef is not with iTV.  It's with ITMS pricing for movies I will never watch twice.

Because I am a sucker for Apple technology, I'll buy an iTV.  But I'm keeping Netflix.  For now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Then I take it you don’t have young kids</i></p>
<p>I do, in fact, have small children who behave exactly as you describe.  These movies fall into the &#8220;purchase&#8221; category, along with some classics that my wife or I will watch more than once.  I will gladly buy these through the ITMS.</p>
<p>And, I agree completely re wear &amp; tear.  In fact, my beef is not with iTV.  It&#8217;s with ITMS pricing for movies I will never watch twice.</p>
<p>Because I am a sucker for Apple technology, I&#8217;ll buy an iTV.  But I&#8217;m keeping Netflix.  For now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blain</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11266</link>
		<dc:creator>Blain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11266</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Most movies do not rate a second viewing.&lt;/i&gt;
Then I take it you don't have young kids. Neither do I, but from the viewing habits of children of friends, well, I never knew you could physically wear out a DVD! Their favorite movies they won't want to see just twice, they want to see it twice daily. Even if, for us, &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0933064/" rel="nofollow"&gt;it doesn't rate a first viewing&lt;/a&gt;.

In fact, that would make the Apple TV even preferable to a cheaper DVD. Hand the kid the remote, and let him pick and choose. No fear of scratching the disk, nor sticky fingers gumming things up, or even futzing up the settings. (At least there's no longer the sandwich in the VCR. Would it now be a &lt;a href="http://www.crazyapplerumors.com/?p=327" rel="nofollow"&gt;waffle&lt;/a&gt; in the drive?)

There's a balance tween rentals and ownership. Apple's going for the same 'you keep it' strategy that worked so well for the music side, vs Napster et al. You could also say one new movie per month via netflicks is twice Apple's cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Most movies do not rate a second viewing.</i><br />
Then I take it you don&#8217;t have young kids. Neither do I, but from the viewing habits of children of friends, well, I never knew you could physically wear out a DVD! Their favorite movies they won&#8217;t want to see just twice, they want to see it twice daily. Even if, for us, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0933064/" rel="nofollow">it doesn&#8217;t rate a first viewing</a>.</p>
<p>In fact, that would make the Apple TV even preferable to a cheaper DVD. Hand the kid the remote, and let him pick and choose. No fear of scratching the disk, nor sticky fingers gumming things up, or even futzing up the settings. (At least there&#8217;s no longer the sandwich in the VCR. Would it now be a <a href="http://www.crazyapplerumors.com/?p=327" rel="nofollow">waffle</a> in the drive?)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a balance tween rentals and ownership. Apple&#8217;s going for the same &#8216;you keep it&#8217; strategy that worked so well for the music side, vs Napster et al. You could also say one new movie per month via netflicks is twice Apple&#8217;s cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Blister</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11250</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Blister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11250</guid>
		<description>Ah, but there is a downside.  Compare the price to other movie services.  Ten movies per month via Netflicks: $18.  Via Apple TV: $99.99.

Most movies do not rate a second viewing.

I would be oh so happy if Apple adopted a Netflix-style rental model where the customer keeps three rentals at a time indefinitely, with an option to buy.  

Oh, and 720p w/ surround, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but there is a downside.  Compare the price to other movie services.  Ten movies per month via Netflicks: $18.  Via Apple TV: $99.99.</p>
<p>Most movies do not rate a second viewing.</p>
<p>I would be oh so happy if Apple adopted a Netflix-style rental model where the customer keeps three rentals at a time indefinitely, with an option to buy.  </p>
<p>Oh, and 720p w/ surround, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Randolph</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11212</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. Randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 04:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11212</guid>
		<description>Gregory,

You do realize I hope, that for everyone who proclaims that they'll never buy a song/video/movie from the iTMS until Apple abandons DRM/adopts Ogg Vorbis/sells uncompressed files/steps up to HD/includes a free sexbot with every iPod, there are thousands of people will go ahead and buy from the iTMS without your approval?

The iTMS is a *mass market* service.  It's not for snobs, because frankly, there aren't enough snobs to matter.

-jcr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gregory,</p>
<p>You do realize I hope, that for everyone who proclaims that they&#8217;ll never buy a song/video/movie from the iTMS until Apple abandons DRM/adopts Ogg Vorbis/sells uncompressed files/steps up to HD/includes a free sexbot with every iPod, there are thousands of people will go ahead and buy from the iTMS without your approval?</p>
<p>The iTMS is a *mass market* service.  It&#8217;s not for snobs, because frankly, there aren&#8217;t enough snobs to matter.</p>
<p>-jcr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Harbin</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11196</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Harbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11196</guid>
		<description>Macalope, I hear what you're saying, but the big difference between Microsoft's solution and Apple's solution is this:

HD.

If you buy a movie from iTunes, it's fuzzy and almost unwatchable unless you're across the room. If you rent a movie from the XBL Marketplace, it's in full 720p glory.

I'll grant you that the time limit is annoying, but I've deleted all the movies I downloaded (after only watching once) from iTunes. If I really want to own a movie, I'll buy the plastic disc that doesn't take up space on my hard drive (only on my shelf).

Until Apple offers 720p (or better yet 1080p) movie and TV downloads, I'm not ever going to buy a video from iTunes. The only current downside to Microsoft's solution is the limited media available, which is less their fault than Apple's. I doubt ABC is ever going to put Lost on Microsoft's box, but if they did, and at 720p, I'd buy it in a heartbeat. 480crap that I get from iTunes isn't worth it when a torrent download is a couple clicks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Macalope, I hear what you&#8217;re saying, but the big difference between Microsoft&#8217;s solution and Apple&#8217;s solution is this:</p>
<p>HD.</p>
<p>If you buy a movie from iTunes, it&#8217;s fuzzy and almost unwatchable unless you&#8217;re across the room. If you rent a movie from the XBL Marketplace, it&#8217;s in full 720p glory.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll grant you that the time limit is annoying, but I&#8217;ve deleted all the movies I downloaded (after only watching once) from iTunes. If I really want to own a movie, I&#8217;ll buy the plastic disc that doesn&#8217;t take up space on my hard drive (only on my shelf).</p>
<p>Until Apple offers 720p (or better yet 1080p) movie and TV downloads, I&#8217;m not ever going to buy a video from iTunes. The only current downside to Microsoft&#8217;s solution is the limited media available, which is less their fault than Apple&#8217;s. I doubt ABC is ever going to put Lost on Microsoft&#8217;s box, but if they did, and at 720p, I&#8217;d buy it in a heartbeat. 480crap that I get from iTunes isn&#8217;t worth it when a torrent download is a couple clicks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauldwaite</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11179</link>
		<dc:creator>pauldwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11179</guid>
		<description>&#62; "Funny how Netflix lets you rent movies, yet doesn’t make you watch them in a specific time frame. The only requirement is to get another one, you gotta return one."

Hmm. I guess Apple could make you delete the last movie you downloaded. Then again, maybe they're worried about people cracking the DRM and burning copies, having only paid a little bit of money for rental.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;Funny how Netflix lets you rent movies, yet doesn’t make you watch them in a specific time frame. The only requirement is to get another one, you gotta return one.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmm. I guess Apple could make you delete the last movie you downloaded. Then again, maybe they&#8217;re worried about people cracking the DRM and burning copies, having only paid a little bit of money for rental.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bergamot</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11178</link>
		<dc:creator>Bergamot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11178</guid>
		<description>"Funny how Netflix lets you rent movies, yet doesn’t make you watch them in a specific time frame. The only requirement is to get another one, you gotta return one."

Well sure, but the Microsoft video rental service is clearly based off the the traditional video rental store model, not the Netflix model. 

I think this was done intentionally; the "keep it as long as you want, but you can only have one at a time" is close enough conceptually to "ownership" that the restrictions seem unreasonably chafing. This may be why most people I know of who use Netflix use it simply as a source of DVDs to rip to their hard drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Funny how Netflix lets you rent movies, yet doesn’t make you watch them in a specific time frame. The only requirement is to get another one, you gotta return one.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well sure, but the Microsoft video rental service is clearly based off the the traditional video rental store model, not the Netflix model. </p>
<p>I think this was done intentionally; the &#8220;keep it as long as you want, but you can only have one at a time&#8221; is close enough conceptually to &#8220;ownership&#8221; that the restrictions seem unreasonably chafing. This may be why most people I know of who use Netflix use it simply as a source of DVDs to rip to their hard drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daring68</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11173</link>
		<dc:creator>daring68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/2007/03/22/and-that-is-why-you-fail/#comment-11173</guid>
		<description>What I find disturbing and hardly ever mention is the fact that the only iTunes store where you can purchase movies and TV shows is the USA store. While most people can otherwise get movies and TV shows into their iTunes (nod to Handbrake and the torrent download system) there will be those who do not have the skills. It also seems to me that these people with less technical skills are going to be the ones more inclined to use a product like Apple TV, catch 22 anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find disturbing and hardly ever mention is the fact that the only iTunes store where you can purchase movies and TV shows is the USA store. While most people can otherwise get movies and TV shows into their iTunes (nod to Handbrake and the torrent download system) there will be those who do not have the skills. It also seems to me that these people with less technical skills are going to be the ones more inclined to use a product like Apple TV, catch 22 anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
