<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No link for you!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/</link>
	<description>Apple news and analysis from everyone's favorite mythical Mac user</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Macalope &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gin rummy.</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12256</link>
		<dc:creator>The Macalope &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gin rummy.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/?p=153#comment-12256</guid>
		<description>[...] The Macalope has discussed this before, of all the silly pundits, Dvorak is really the one who deserves no links. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Macalope has discussed this before, of all the silly pundits, Dvorak is really the one who deserves no links. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManxStef</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4923</link>
		<dc:creator>ManxStef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/?p=153#comment-4923</guid>
		<description>@The Macalope

Aye, unfortunately it was the whole comment that vanished.  As it contained a hyperlink I thought it may have been flagged for extra moderation and accidentally zapped. Well, either that, or you didn't like what I said!

Here's the link I originally posted containing more information on the "nofollow" attribute:
http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-nofollow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@The Macalope</p>
<p>Aye, unfortunately it was the whole comment that vanished.  As it contained a hyperlink I thought it may have been flagged for extra moderation and accidentally zapped. Well, either that, or you didn&#8217;t like what I said!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the link I originally posted containing more information on the &#8220;nofollow&#8221; attribute:<br />
<a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-nofollow</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bergamot</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4922</link>
		<dc:creator>Bergamot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/?p=153#comment-4922</guid>
		<description>Manxstef: That would only prevent his page from getting high Google PageRank scores. My method would do that, but also prevent him from profiting on Macalope-directed traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manxstef: That would only prevent his page from getting high Google PageRank scores. My method would do that, but also prevent him from profiting on Macalope-directed traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Macalope</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4889</link>
		<dc:creator>The Macalope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/?p=153#comment-4889</guid>
		<description>The Macalope's not sure what happened but the link you posted didn't appear -- only the "rel=nofollow" part.  It's possible WordPress lost it.  The Macalope pasted in the link for you and must have pasted over the attribute.

(Unless you're saying the whole comment got lost in which case the Macalope's thinking of another comment....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Macalope&#8217;s not sure what happened but the link you posted didn&#8217;t appear &#8212; only the &#8220;rel=nofollow&#8221; part.  It&#8217;s possible WordPress lost it.  The Macalope pasted in the link for you and must have pasted over the attribute.</p>
<p>(Unless you&#8217;re saying the whole comment got lost in which case the Macalope&#8217;s thinking of another comment&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManxStef</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4884</link>
		<dc:creator>ManxStef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/?p=153#comment-4884</guid>
		<description>@Bergamot

There's a better way: use the rel=nofollow attribute when you link.  This tells search engines not to give any extra credit/rank to the linked-to article, which means you can link without inferring an endorsement.  (I did post this earlier but it looks like it got lost in moderation.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bergamot</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a better way: use the rel=nofollow attribute when you link.  This tells search engines not to give any extra credit/rank to the linked-to article, which means you can link without inferring an endorsement.  (I did post this earlier but it looks like it got lost in moderation.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bergamot</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4850</link>
		<dc:creator>Bergamot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/?p=153#comment-4850</guid>
		<description>I said it in the comments for the last Enderle piece, and I'll say it again here:

Link to a cached copy of the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said it in the comments for the last Enderle piece, and I&#8217;ll say it again here:</p>
<p>Link to a cached copy of the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4783</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/?p=153#comment-4783</guid>
		<description>I think a more telling quote from the article Gruber links to is as follows (with regards to porting Adobe's apps to Linux) 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Four of the top ten are Adobe products.

That said, I assume that ports have already been completed on most of those programs on the list "just in case." If so, the tide toward a Linux desktop OS could happen so fast—overnight, in fact—that everyone would be shocked.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Hnn. Methinks not. If it's taken Adobe this long to make the switch from codwarrior to xcode (and by extention, into the realm of universal), I think it'd take faaar longer for them to get up and running on even one linux distro. If Adobe goes to linux, they go somethink like winelib first. Besides. 'Taint gonna happen anytime soon. Not CS3, not CS4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a more telling quote from the article Gruber links to is as follows (with regards to porting Adobe&#8217;s apps to Linux) </p>
<blockquote><p>Four of the top ten are Adobe products.</p>
<p>That said, I assume that ports have already been completed on most of those programs on the list &#8220;just in case.&#8221; If so, the tide toward a Linux desktop OS could happen so fast—overnight, in fact—that everyone would be shocked.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hnn. Methinks not. If it&#8217;s taken Adobe this long to make the switch from codwarrior to xcode (and by extention, into the realm of universal), I think it&#8217;d take faaar longer for them to get up and running on even one linux distro. If Adobe goes to linux, they go somethink like winelib first. Besides. &#8216;Taint gonna happen anytime soon. Not CS3, not CS4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cannibal</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4765</link>
		<dc:creator>Cannibal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 03:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/?p=153#comment-4765</guid>
		<description>so dvorak croaks out this line:
"From what I can tell, the Mac community likes Vista more than the PC community.”

and as a number of people have surmised, the commentprobably camefrom some gracious comments regarding the OS on the most recent TWiTpodcast (always worth listening to - despite dvoraks input andattempts to poison the product)...

i would like to remind the "cranky geek" (his term for himself, not mine) that the sentiment was as follows - 

it's the best version of windows yet. but it is still windows.

now when you consider the people who were saying it, the meaning is quite clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so dvorak croaks out this line:<br />
&#8220;From what I can tell, the Mac community likes Vista more than the PC community.”</p>
<p>and as a number of people have surmised, the commentprobably camefrom some gracious comments regarding the OS on the most recent TWiTpodcast (always worth listening to - despite dvoraks input andattempts to poison the product)&#8230;</p>
<p>i would like to remind the &#8220;cranky geek&#8221; (his term for himself, not mine) that the sentiment was as follows - </p>
<p>it&#8217;s the best version of windows yet. but it is still windows.</p>
<p>now when you consider the people who were saying it, the meaning is quite clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iheartbeer</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator>iheartbeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/?p=153#comment-4754</guid>
		<description>Dvorak is to technology what Rush Limbaugh is to politics. 

The formula used: the more outrageous and outspoken you are, the more controversy you create, in turn generating revenue from allies and adversaries. Clicky-clicky.

While ignoring the curmudgeon won't make him go away, it sure feels better. 

But, if Mac users really wanted to deflate his ego they'd consistently respond that he isn't relevant anymore because he's too damn old ("pushing 70 I hear...", "adult diapers, really?"). JCD could use a good dose of his own false-truth medicine, and I feel the karma pendulum swinging. 

Now, on to a more important topic: why aren't you and Gruber doing a Macalope/Fireball podcast? You could always filter your voice for anonymity. And to start off, invite Dvorak on. Just be sure to cut your audio feed to him half-way through the show, so when he starts complaining he can't hear anything, you can blame it on his hearing aid dying. 

That should get the ball rolling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dvorak is to technology what Rush Limbaugh is to politics. </p>
<p>The formula used: the more outrageous and outspoken you are, the more controversy you create, in turn generating revenue from allies and adversaries. Clicky-clicky.</p>
<p>While ignoring the curmudgeon won&#8217;t make him go away, it sure feels better. </p>
<p>But, if Mac users really wanted to deflate his ego they&#8217;d consistently respond that he isn&#8217;t relevant anymore because he&#8217;s too damn old (&#8221;pushing 70 I hear&#8230;&#8221;, &#8220;adult diapers, really?&#8221;). JCD could use a good dose of his own false-truth medicine, and I feel the karma pendulum swinging. </p>
<p>Now, on to a more important topic: why aren&#8217;t you and Gruber doing a Macalope/Fireball podcast? You could always filter your voice for anonymity. And to start off, invite Dvorak on. Just be sure to cut your audio feed to him half-way through the show, so when he starts complaining he can&#8217;t hear anything, you can blame it on his hearing aid dying. </p>
<p>That should get the ball rolling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rip Ragged</title>
		<link>http://www.macalope.com/2007/01/26/no-link-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4751</link>
		<dc:creator>Rip Ragged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macalope.com/?p=153#comment-4751</guid>
		<description>John,

Agreed. And rejoicing. I really don't (and no Mac afficionado should) want Macintosh to become the dominant operating system. Apple benefits from being a minority player – for many reasons.

All the malware is being written for Windows. This one is huge, and in large part depends on Windows remaining the choice of Government and Enterprise. It helps that people with low self-esteem (virus writers) generally prefer a low price point for access to machines.

Underdog status is crucial for us "fanboys." We're better at the fringes.

What other computer company can shoot for 20% of the market. For that matter, which car company has a 20% market share. At 15% Apple would be kicking some serious buttocks.

Apple is on the brink of doing some really huge things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Agreed. And rejoicing. I really don&#8217;t (and no Mac afficionado should) want Macintosh to become the dominant operating system. Apple benefits from being a minority player – for many reasons.</p>
<p>All the malware is being written for Windows. This one is huge, and in large part depends on Windows remaining the choice of Government and Enterprise. It helps that people with low self-esteem (virus writers) generally prefer a low price point for access to machines.</p>
<p>Underdog status is crucial for us &#8220;fanboys.&#8221; We&#8217;re better at the fringes.</p>
<p>What other computer company can shoot for 20% of the market. For that matter, which car company has a 20% market share. At 15% Apple would be kicking some serious buttocks.</p>
<p>Apple is on the brink of doing some really huge things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
